Bundibugyo Decides: Is the NRM Line-Up Method Tearing Us Apart?

 


The recently concluded NRM LC1 flagbearers' elections in Bundibugyo District left a mark not just on the political calendars, but on local voters' and aspiring leaders' hearts and minds. As the process required voters to line up behind their candidates, many are now reflecting on the meaning and impact of this public voting method in a district where NRM dominates the political landscape.

The Line-Up Voting Method: A Double-Edged Sword



On the surface, lining up behind a candidate seems like a straightforward, transparent, and low-cost way to determine the people's choice. However, in communities like Bundibugyo, where extended families, friendships, and clan ties strongly influence daily life, this format can put voters in an uncomfortable position.

In some villages, people feared offending relatives or local influencers by choosing a different candidate. Others quietly followed the majority to avoid being isolated or targeted. While the intention was democratic participation, the result sometimes looked more like public loyalty tests than free political expression.


Effects on Upcoming NRM Flagbearer Elections

As Bundibugyo heads toward more NRM flagbearer elections for LC3S, LC5s, and Members of Parliament, the lessons from the LC1 process should not be ignored. If lining up becomes the standard method across all levels, voter intimidation, community division, and reduced political diversity could increase.

In a district that has proudly flown the NRM flag for decades, internal processes must go beyond party loyalty—they must be built on integrity, fairness, and voter protection. If the process discourages new leadership or silences alternative voices within the party, Bundibugyo risks stagnating politically despite its strong NRM support base.


Bundibugyo’s Political Climate: Fragile or Firm?


The LC1 elections exposed how fragile community trust can become when democratic processes are not carefully managed. Politics in Bundibugyo is personal, and when a voter’s choice is made public, it can ignite rivalries and long-standing grudges.

Going forward, NRM’s local and district leaders must recognise that sustaining peace and unity is just as important as winning votes. The party’s dominance in Bundibugyo should not lead to complacency but to a deeper investment in inclusive, respectful, and fair internal elections.


A Call to Action: Strengthening Internal Democracy

As Bundibugyo sets the pace for political participation in the Rwenzori region, it is time to reflect and act. Let NRM leaders at all levels engage in honest conversations about the format of these elections and how they affect the morale of both candidates and voters. Innovation, dialogue, and reform should shape the path ahead.

If Bundibugyo is to continue as a pillar of NRM support, it must also lead in practising democracy the right way—from the smallest village to the highest office.



Comments